Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Ä¡±Ù ÀÌ°³ºÎ º´¼ÒÀÇ Ä¡±ÙóÁö¹æ¹ý¿¡ µû¸¥ ÁÖ»çÇö¹Ì°æÀû ¿¬±¸

The SEM Observation of The Various Root Treatment Effect On Furcation Area

´ëÇÑÄ¡ÁÖ°úÇÐȸÁö 1997³â 27±Ç 1È£ p.205 ~ 215
¹ÚÇö¼ö, ÀÓ¼ººó, Á¤ÁøÇü,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
¹ÚÇö¼ö (  ) - ´Ü±¹´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡ÁÖ°úÇб³½Ç
ÀÓ¼ººó ( Lim Sung-Bin ) - ´Ü±¹´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡ÁÖ°úÇб³½Ç
Á¤ÁøÇü ( Chung Chin-Hyung ) - ´Ü±¹´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡ÁÖ°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract


In periodontal regeneration treatment, access to the frucation area is very difficult. Thus complete removal of plaque, calculus and endotoxin is somewhat impossible. In this study, teeth that were extracted due to periodontal disease were used. The furcation area was treated with periodontal cureet, ultrasonic scaler, roto bur and they observed using SEM.
The result was follow 1. The group treatment with cureet showed remaining plaque, the cementum existed in most of the surface and partial dentinal tubule orifice could be seen. 2. The group treatment with ultrasonic scaler showed less removal of plaque compared to curette and irregular surface could be seen. 3. The group treatment with roto bur showed cleaner surface and many dentinal tubule orifice could be seen compared to the curette and ultrasonic scaler groups. Thus when suing treatments such as bone grafting or guided tissue regeneration, it is considered that the furcation area should be treatment with Roto bur.

Å°¿öµå

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI